Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31181 - 31190 of 63197 for records.
Search results 31181 - 31190 of 63197 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Stephen Greer
), and RULE 809.32(1), STATS., to which Greer responded. After an independent review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11767 - 2017-09-20
), and RULE 809.32(1), STATS., to which Greer responded. After an independent review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11767 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
factual finding if the record shows it to be clearly erroneous, after accepting all credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143654 - 2015-06-29
factual finding if the record shows it to be clearly erroneous, after accepting all credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143654 - 2015-06-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812059 - 2024-06-11
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812059 - 2024-06-11
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94478 - 2014-09-15
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94478 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to modify a restitution order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284553 - 2020-09-03
to modify a restitution order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284553 - 2020-09-03
Thomas McPhetridge v. Jon E. Litscher
by sufficient evidence of record. See Van Ermen v. DHSS, 84 Wis. 2d 57, 63, 267 N.W.2d 17 (1978). We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4148 - 2005-03-31
by sufficient evidence of record. See Van Ermen v. DHSS, 84 Wis. 2d 57, 63, 267 N.W.2d 17 (1978). We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4148 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher A. Cody
discretion. See State v. Mosley, 201 Wis. 2d 36, 43, 547 N.W.2d 806 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15661 - 2017-09-21
discretion. See State v. Mosley, 201 Wis. 2d 36, 43, 547 N.W.2d 806 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15661 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ronald C. Smith
the conviction. Because the record contains sufficient evidence to uphold the conviction, this court affirms. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4446 - 2005-03-31
the conviction. Because the record contains sufficient evidence to uphold the conviction, this court affirms. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4446 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92807 - 2013-02-07
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92807 - 2013-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to accept Michael’s version of facts. The record reflects the court’s consideration of appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112237 - 2017-09-21
to accept Michael’s version of facts. The record reflects the court’s consideration of appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112237 - 2017-09-21