Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31191 - 31200 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 31191 - 31200 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
Michael Zieve v. Jack R. Hayes
, Zieve filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that Hayes had failed to respond to Zieve’s request
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4879 - 2017-09-19
, Zieve filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that Hayes had failed to respond to Zieve’s request
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4879 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in determining that the deputy acted in good faith and denying Patel’s motion to suppress. We affirm. Background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112277 - 2014-05-13
in determining that the deputy acted in good faith and denying Patel’s motion to suppress. We affirm. Background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112277 - 2014-05-13
[PDF]
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. City of Milwaukee
did not file a notice of claim with the City. The City brought a motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8663 - 2017-09-19
did not file a notice of claim with the City. The City brought a motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8663 - 2017-09-19
State v. Norbert W. Ellis
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief.[1] Ellis argues his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5860 - 2005-03-31
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief.[1] Ellis argues his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5860 - 2005-03-31
County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
a charge on its own motion or to amend the pleadings sua sponte, this court reverses and remands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4470 - 2005-03-31
a charge on its own motion or to amend the pleadings sua sponte, this court reverses and remands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4470 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667119 - 2023-06-13
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667119 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Caspersen
necessary to put it in motion. The second element requires that the defendant was under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4920 - 2017-09-19
necessary to put it in motion. The second element requires that the defendant was under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4920 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the circuit court that denied his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2021-22)1 motion for postconviction relief. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627174 - 2023-02-28
of the circuit court that denied his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2021-22)1 motion for postconviction relief. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627174 - 2023-02-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in denying their motion to compel discovery. We affirm. ¶2 Silver Oak executed and delivered to the Bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93086 - 2014-09-15
in denying their motion to compel discovery. We affirm. ¶2 Silver Oak executed and delivered to the Bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93086 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-party complaint. ¶5 The trial court denied the Association’s motion to dismiss most of Homestead’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166278 - 2017-09-21
-party complaint. ¶5 The trial court denied the Association’s motion to dismiss most of Homestead’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166278 - 2017-09-21