Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31191 - 31200 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 31191 - 31200 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Henry L. Williams
on establishing repeater status imposes or suggests such a requirement. ¶12 The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3154 - 2005-03-31
on establishing repeater status imposes or suggests such a requirement. ¶12 The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3154 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the defendant has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31786 - 2014-09-15
, the defendant has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31786 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
). ¶13 We first dispose of the obvious, there is nothing in the record to support a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48272 - 2014-09-15
). ¶13 We first dispose of the obvious, there is nothing in the record to support a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48272 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and conclude that the record supports the court’s exercise of discretion. Watling also appeals the sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53106 - 2010-08-10
and conclude that the record supports the court’s exercise of discretion. Watling also appeals the sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53106 - 2010-08-10
Charles A. Mikrut v. State
of court. Because the appellate record did not reveal whether this action was taken sua sponte
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11447 - 2005-03-31
of court. Because the appellate record did not reveal whether this action was taken sua sponte
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11447 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1130020 - 2026-06-11
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1130020 - 2026-06-11
[PDF]
State v. George Mason
of the PSI was not the same as the one in the court’s file. Our review of the record reveals that Mason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5714 - 2017-09-19
of the PSI was not the same as the one in the court’s file. Our review of the record reveals that Mason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5714 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P. Sutherland
in the record to support the jury’s verdict. Destefano testified that he was dispatched to the accident scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2554 - 2017-09-19
in the record to support the jury’s verdict. Destefano testified that he was dispatched to the accident scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2554 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to support a continuation of R.D.S’s protective placement. As explained below, the record establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=556912 - 2022-08-22
to support a continuation of R.D.S’s protective placement. As explained below, the record establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=556912 - 2022-08-22
State v. Richard A. Thomas
with the sentencing discretion of a trial court. See id. If this court determines from the record that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12743 - 2005-03-31
with the sentencing discretion of a trial court. See id. If this court determines from the record that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12743 - 2005-03-31