Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 50845 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Anggaran Dana Pemasangan Pintu Kaca Office Surakarta.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 50845 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Anggaran Dana Pemasangan Pintu Kaca Office Surakarta.
State v. Rick R. Rome
into his home and closet was not justified by emergency circumstances because the police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2418 - 2005-03-31
into his home and closet was not justified by emergency circumstances because the police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2418 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a repeater, based on allegations that Pritchard struck Correctional Officer B.B. once in the face with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176592 - 2017-09-21
as a repeater, based on allegations that Pritchard struck Correctional Officer B.B. once in the face with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
White. ΒΆ3 The officer who investigated this battery returned to work for his next shift late
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46365 - 2014-09-15
White. ΒΆ3 The officer who investigated this battery returned to work for his next shift late
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46365 - 2014-09-15
wi APP 17 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2907-CR Complete Title...
alleged that, on July 3, 2010, police officers stopped a vehicle owned by Brown, in which Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91595 - 2006-11-02
alleged that, on July 3, 2010, police officers stopped a vehicle owned by Brown, in which Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91595 - 2006-11-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC), second offense. Swan contends that the arresting officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167017 - 2017-09-21
with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC), second offense. Swan contends that the arresting officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167017 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dennis G. Valstad
year.[2] Valstad argues that his refusal was proper because the officer did not have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6260 - 2005-03-31
year.[2] Valstad argues that his refusal was proper because the officer did not have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6260 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth L. Larson
the officers gathered to execute the warrant about 3:00 a.m. on May 27, 1992, they had reason to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9365 - 2017-09-19
the officers gathered to execute the warrant about 3:00 a.m. on May 27, 1992, they had reason to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9365 - 2017-09-19
State v. Curtis E. Dittberner
the State failed to prove that an arresting officer had probable cause to arrest him for operating his motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3291 - 2005-03-31
the State failed to prove that an arresting officer had probable cause to arrest him for operating his motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3291 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Curtis E. Dittberner
because the State failed to prove that an arresting officer had probable cause to arrest him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3291 - 2017-09-19
because the State failed to prove that an arresting officer had probable cause to arrest him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3291 - 2017-09-19
State v. Stephen Lavert Grant
led to the discovery of the cocaine and handgun.[2] Because the officers had probable cause to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12722 - 2005-03-31
led to the discovery of the cocaine and handgun.[2] Because the officers had probable cause to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12722 - 2005-03-31