Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 3963 for davi.

[PDF] Goex Corporation v. Martek Holdings, Inc.
A. Schroeder and Christopher A. Davies of Consigny, Andrews, Hemming & Grant, S.C. of Janesville
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14897 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
; see also Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 822 (2006) (where the court held that a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210186 - 2018-03-27

[PDF] State v. Charles Chvala
efficiently and effectively to provide the fair administration of justice.” City of Sun Prairie v. Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6287 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
and there was no ‘clear and justifiable excuse’ for the party’s noncompliance. Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94136 - 2013-03-13

[PDF] WI APP 42
of Sun Prairie v. Davis, 226 Wis. 2d 738, 749-50, 595 N.W.2d 635 (1999) (courts have inherent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35927 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 25
dismissing a case as improvidently granted is proper. See State ex rel. Davis v. Cir. Ct. for Dane Cnty
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974581 - 2025-06-24

[PDF] Mark Regal v. General Motors Corporation
County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5016 - 2017-09-19

James Antisdel v. City of Oak Creek Police and Fire Commission
-respondents-petitioners there were briefs by Kathy L. Nusslock, Nancy L. Pirkey and Davis & Kuelthau, S.C
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17340 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gregory Robinson
independently. See State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513, 519, 545 N.W.2d 244 (Ct. App. 1996). DISCUSSION ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3878 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Mary Ann Jones v. The Estate of Robert G. Jones
. Davis, 2001 WI 136, 248 Wis. 2d 986, 637 N.W.2d 62 (statutory right to prompt disposition); In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16495 - 2017-09-21