Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 30072 for de.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 30072 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Yolanda L.
-2844 02-2845 02-2846 6 of law reviewed de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5811 - 2017-09-19
-2844 02-2845 02-2846 6 of law reviewed de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5811 - 2017-09-19
Frank Murphy v. Bruno Independent Living Aids
a question of law that we review de novo. United Methodist Church v. Culver, 2000 WI App 132, ¶25, 237 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4144 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. United Methodist Church v. Culver, 2000 WI App 132, ¶25, 237 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4144 - 2005-03-31
court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion ...
judgment, we apply the same methodology as the circuit court and review de novo the grant or denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89924 - 2013-01-29
judgment, we apply the same methodology as the circuit court and review de novo the grant or denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89924 - 2013-01-29
[PDF]
Department of Regulation & Licensing v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
weight deference, and de novo review. UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis.2d 274, 284, 548 N.W.2d 57, 61 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12091 - 2017-09-21
weight deference, and de novo review. UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis.2d 274, 284, 548 N.W.2d 57, 61 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12091 - 2017-09-21
Royal C. Neumann v. Town of Waukesha
of a conditional use permit for a commercial PUD in a residential district was a “de facto rezoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7817 - 2005-03-31
of a conditional use permit for a commercial PUD in a residential district was a “de facto rezoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7817 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts as found by the [circuit] court meet the constitutional standard” is reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122397 - 2014-09-25
the facts as found by the [circuit] court meet the constitutional standard” is reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122397 - 2014-09-25
2010 WI APP 25
of the Board, not that of the circuit court, and we do so de novo. State ex rel. Sprewell v. McCaughtry, 226
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45402 - 2010-02-23
of the Board, not that of the circuit court, and we do so de novo. State ex rel. Sprewell v. McCaughtry, 226
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45402 - 2010-02-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶7 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96628 - 2014-09-15
. ¶7 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96628 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jeffrey Allen v. Waukesha County Board of Adjustment
conducts a de novo review of the board’s decision. See Miswald v. Waukesha County Bd. of Adjustment, 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11666 - 2017-09-19
conducts a de novo review of the board’s decision. See Miswald v. Waukesha County Bd. of Adjustment, 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11666 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Hilary H. Koch, Jr.
and oral argument by Mark S. Des Rochers of Lawrence & Des Rochers, S.C. of St. Nazianz. On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7870 - 2017-09-19
and oral argument by Mark S. Des Rochers of Lawrence & Des Rochers, S.C. of St. Nazianz. On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7870 - 2017-09-19