Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 29942 for des.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
Community Development Authority v. Racine County Condemnation Commission
at summary judgment, a procedure which we review de novo, inquiring whether the movant is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21170 - 2017-09-21
at summary judgment, a procedure which we review de novo, inquiring whether the movant is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21170 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frank Murphy v. Bruno Independent Living Aids
). A summary judgment motion presents a question of law that we review de novo. United Methodist Church v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4144 - 2017-09-20
). A summary judgment motion presents a question of law that we review de novo. United Methodist Church v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4144 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reason to avoid the procedural bar imposed by § 974.06 is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241493 - 2019-05-29
reason to avoid the procedural bar imposed by § 974.06 is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241493 - 2019-05-29
[PDF]
Norman S. De Ruyter v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for review filed NORMAN S. DE RUYTER, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6923 - 2017-09-20
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for review filed NORMAN S. DE RUYTER, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6923 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 2
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58086 - 2014-09-15
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58086 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requested a trial de novo pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). Following a two-day trial de novo, the Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239681 - 2019-04-25
requested a trial de novo pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). Following a two-day trial de novo, the Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239681 - 2019-04-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of federal courts review the first factor de novo, although any factual findings relevant to this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963881 - 2025-06-03
of federal courts review the first factor de novo, although any factual findings relevant to this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963881 - 2025-06-03
2011 WI APP 2
. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58086 - 2011-01-30
. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58086 - 2011-01-30
[PDF]
WI APP 127
as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s ruling on summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101998 - 2017-09-21
as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s ruling on summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101998 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dennis J. King
review de novo. See Bank of Barron v. Gieseke, 169 Wis.2d 437, 454-55, 485 N.W.2d 426, 432 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11467 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See Bank of Barron v. Gieseke, 169 Wis.2d 437, 454-55, 485 N.W.2d 426, 432 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11467 - 2017-09-19