Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 29827 for des.

Norman S. De Ruyter v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Title of Case: †Petition for review filed Norman S. De Ruyter, Plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6923 - 2005-03-31

wi app 127 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP282 Complete Title of...
to a judgment as a matter of law.” Wis. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101998 - 2013-10-29

wi app 78 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP3166-CR Complete Title...
they require is de novo. See Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis. 2d 191, 201, 496 N.W.2d 57, 61 (1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64184 - 2011-06-28

[PDF] WI APP 2
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58086 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
action against Miller. Following the court commissioner’s decision, Miller requested a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31822 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
requested a trial de novo pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). Following a two-day trial de novo, the Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239681 - 2019-04-25

[PDF] Jennifer L. Sheppard v. William P. Jensen
, and we decline to make Jennifer a de facto partner. We affirm the circuit court’s ruling that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7171 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
reason to avoid the procedural bar imposed by § 974.06 is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241493 - 2019-05-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an ambiguity exists is also a question of law that we review de novo. Id. No. 2012AP1188 6 ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93997 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. James E. Thomas
de novo. See id. “[I]f the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14398 - 2014-09-15