Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 68348 for did.

[PDF] NOTICE
his first name, because he knew that Penkalski had sued a prior building manager, and did not want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57060 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, and did not want him to know who he was. Shortly after that incident, Penkalski sent Bins an email
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57060 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, but he did not work here that much.” The writer also reported that the phone number Morgan had provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56991 - 2010-11-22

COURT OF APPEALS
to withdraw his pleas on the grounds that he did not fully understand the elements of the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55527 - 2010-10-13

State v. Robert F. Jones
did not have reasonable suspicion that he was armed and therefore the officer’s patdown search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19063 - 2005-07-18

William James Schmidt v. Gerald Schmidt
¾the amount of Gerald’s outstanding principal balance on the May 1983 note. Gerald did not execute a renewal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13533 - 2005-03-31

State v. Melvin E. Vance
White, Vance’s girlfriend at the time, testified she was a passenger in the van but did not know what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7026 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
have been raised because: (1) his trial counsel did not hire an No. 2011AP642 4 expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90212 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
deception did not render Cazares-Herrera’s consent involuntary and use of the DNA sample did not exceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93175 - 2013-02-20

[PDF] City of Madison v. Robert R. Schultz
Amendment. We conclude the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15158 - 2017-09-21