Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
complied with or properly extended for good cause, without objection, to accommodate the parties’ varying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851534 - 2024-09-17
complied with or properly extended for good cause, without objection, to accommodate the parties’ varying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851534 - 2024-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
complied with or properly extended for good cause, without objection, to accommodate the parties’ varying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851534 - 2024-09-17
complied with or properly extended for good cause, without objection, to accommodate the parties’ varying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851534 - 2024-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is that a reconsideration motion should not be used to extend the time to appeal from a judgment or order when that time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682552 - 2023-07-25
is that a reconsideration motion should not be used to extend the time to appeal from a judgment or order when that time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682552 - 2023-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
, comprised of three years of initial confinement and seven years of extended supervision. The only issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37529 - 2009-07-13
, comprised of three years of initial confinement and seven years of extended supervision. The only issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37529 - 2009-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s conclusion that the State did not extend the alleged offer, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50001 - 2010-05-17
the circuit court’s conclusion that the State did not extend the alleged offer, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50001 - 2010-05-17
CA Blank Order
bifurcated sentence, with ten years of initial confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107627 - 2014-02-04
bifurcated sentence, with ten years of initial confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107627 - 2014-02-04
[PDF]
Outagamie County Department of Human Services v. Ismael P.
). Ismael contends that the trial court did not find good cause to extend the time limits pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3574 - 2017-09-19
). Ismael contends that the trial court did not find good cause to extend the time limits pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3574 - 2017-09-19
Outagamie County Department of Human Services v. Ismael P.
that the trial court did not find good cause to extend the time limits pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 48.315(2). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3574 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court did not find good cause to extend the time limits pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 48.315(2). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3574 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was sentenced to concurrent terms of fourteen years’ initial confinement, ten years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91196 - 2014-09-15
was sentenced to concurrent terms of fourteen years’ initial confinement, ten years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91196 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
year each of initial confinement and extended supervision. 2 This no-merit appeal followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107821 - 2017-09-21
year each of initial confinement and extended supervision. 2 This no-merit appeal followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107821 - 2017-09-21