Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 49879 for our.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 49879 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit to a challenge to the circuit court’s exercise of its sentencing discretion. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756697 - 2024-02-01
merit to a challenge to the circuit court’s exercise of its sentencing discretion. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756697 - 2024-02-01
CA Blank Order
was advised of his right to file a response and has responded. Upon our independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91978 - 2013-01-21
was advised of his right to file a response and has responded. Upon our independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91978 - 2013-01-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. It then terminated Nicole’s parental rights. ¶5 Nicole appealed. With our permission, she filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35966 - 2014-09-15
. It then terminated Nicole’s parental rights. ¶5 Nicole appealed. With our permission, she filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35966 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gerald Seay
the validity of the sentencing. Based on counsel’s report, and our independent review of the record, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13899 - 2005-03-31
the validity of the sentencing. Based on counsel’s report, and our independent review of the record, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13899 - 2005-03-31
Robert M. Pace v. Circuit Court for Oneida County
of our decision, and asked us to "remand to the trial court the issue whether the structure satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13500 - 2005-03-31
of our decision, and asked us to "remand to the trial court the issue whether the structure satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13500 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
no contest to two counts of first-degree reckless homicide. As we explained in our decision in Thao’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901281 - 2025-01-22
no contest to two counts of first-degree reckless homicide. As we explained in our decision in Thao’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901281 - 2025-01-22
CA Blank Order
assistance of counsel. Upon our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131966 - 2014-12-22
assistance of counsel. Upon our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131966 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Juan Jesus S.
. As explained in State v. Lechner, 217 Wis.2d 392, 576 N.W.2d 912 (1998), our focus changes with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14480 - 2017-09-21
. As explained in State v. Lechner, 217 Wis.2d 392, 576 N.W.2d 912 (1998), our focus changes with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14480 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Based on our review of the no-merit report and our independent review of the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251122 - 2019-12-06
a response. Based on our review of the no-merit report and our independent review of the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251122 - 2019-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635037 - 2023-03-21
right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635037 - 2023-03-21