Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 58511 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as a repeater, and possession of a firearm by a felon. On the date Edwards’ trial was set to begin, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397014 - 2021-07-28

Judith C. Dutchin v. Winston L. Dutchin
his motion for reconsideration. Winston argues that the trial court erred when it failed to include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6427 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Judith C. Dutchin v. Winston L. Dutchin
appeals from an order denying his motion for reconsideration. Winston argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6427 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kenneth L. Bingham
to resentencing because the trial court No. 2004AP2738-CR 2 focused too much attention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20494 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kenneth L. Bingham
is entitled to resentencing because the trial court focused too much attention on a dismissed criminal charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20494 - 2005-12-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction, following a jury trial, for armed robbery as party to the crime and as a repeater, burglary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185298 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Alternatively, he seeks a new trial in the interest of justice. Triolo further requests that we require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104448 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Tina L. Lamb v. Bruce A. Lamb
him from Tina Lamb after ten years of marriage. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3218 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
of trial counsel. We conclude it was error for the trial court to answer a jury question and send
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28035 - 2007-02-06

Tina L. Lamb v. Bruce A. Lamb
. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court erred in including the value of a 1956 Chevrolet car in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3218 - 2005-03-31