Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 65287 for timed.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 65287 for timed.
State v. Tommy Donnell Forrest
of the sentence cannot be reduced by good time or parole. He also claims that his not guilty by reason of mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20237 - 2005-12-21
of the sentence cannot be reduced by good time or parole. He also claims that his not guilty by reason of mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20237 - 2005-12-21
State v. Terry L. Cox
offense. She claims that the trial court erred in sentencing her as a third-time OMVWI offender because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7479 - 2005-03-31
offense. She claims that the trial court erred in sentencing her as a third-time OMVWI offender because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7479 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
calculated his sentence credit by not crediting time served to two separate cases that were ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119848 - 2014-08-25
calculated his sentence credit by not crediting time served to two separate cases that were ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119848 - 2014-08-25
CA Blank Order
. On February 26, 2012, Ellefsen was arrested and charged in the present case. At the same time, probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133852 - 2015-02-03
. On February 26, 2012, Ellefsen was arrested and charged in the present case. At the same time, probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133852 - 2015-02-03
State v. Xhevat Tahiri
a hearing because Tahiri had not timely filed a brief and supporting affidavits in support of the motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11705 - 2005-03-31
a hearing because Tahiri had not timely filed a brief and supporting affidavits in support of the motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11705 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
Statutes are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. [2] One son was two years old at the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97348 - 2013-05-28
Statutes are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. [2] One son was two years old at the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97348 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
his weaving was minimal and “happened a very few times over a great distance.” In Post, the supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31485 - 2014-09-15
his weaving was minimal and “happened a very few times over a great distance.” In Post, the supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31485 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. Wisconsin Parole Commission
contends that he is not bound by the time limitation set forth in § 893.735(2) because he is currently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15849 - 2017-09-21
contends that he is not bound by the time limitation set forth in § 893.735(2) because he is currently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15849 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, the officer testified that he normally never saw cars at that time of night at the boat landing where he found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28645 - 2007-04-04
, the officer testified that he normally never saw cars at that time of night at the boat landing where he found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28645 - 2007-04-04
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. Wisconsin Parole Commission
) (1997-98).[1] Frohwirth contends that he is not bound by the time limitation set forth in § 893.735(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15849 - 2005-03-31
) (1997-98).[1] Frohwirth contends that he is not bound by the time limitation set forth in § 893.735(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15849 - 2005-03-31