Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31201 - 31210 of 63197 for records.
Search results 31201 - 31210 of 63197 for records.
Joseph E. Sabol v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
, “agricultural use” does not include personal gardens and hobby farms. Based on the record before us, we cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7070 - 2005-03-31
, “agricultural use” does not include personal gardens and hobby farms. Based on the record before us, we cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7070 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Quinton Jackson v. George Daley, M.D.
records and spoke with his primary examining physician. He was thus aware that two of the seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11969 - 2017-09-21
records and spoke with his primary examining physician. He was thus aware that two of the seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11969 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
CA Blank Order
an evidentiary hearing on his motion challenging the search. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102847 - 2013-10-15
an evidentiary hearing on his motion challenging the search. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102847 - 2013-10-15
CA Blank Order
of these submissions and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment and order may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106759 - 2014-01-21
of these submissions and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment and order may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106759 - 2014-01-21
CA Blank Order
, and 939.50(3)(h) (2011-12).[1] Garcia has not responded. Although our initial review of the record shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104491 - 2013-11-13
, and 939.50(3)(h) (2011-12).[1] Garcia has not responded. Although our initial review of the record shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104491 - 2013-11-13
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112239 - 2014-05-08
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112239 - 2014-05-08
State v. Glenn Eric Rhodes
: “It is a fact of record that the only thing that the defendant-appellant [Rhodes] was in possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14158 - 2005-03-31
: “It is a fact of record that the only thing that the defendant-appellant [Rhodes] was in possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14158 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144307 - 2015-07-14
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144307 - 2015-07-14
CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107784 - 2014-02-03
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107784 - 2014-02-03