Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31211 - 31220 of 76954 for judgment for u s.

[PDF] State v. Charles D. Yoder
a sentence, shall take the guidelines established under s. 973.011 into consideration." If the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8251 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
To: Hon. Michael R. Fitzpatrick Circuit Court Judge 51 S. Main Street Janesville, WI 53545
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101816 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
child in need of protection and services (CHIPS). The no-merit report addresses whether S.W.’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=274247 - 2020-08-04

[PDF] Larry Tiepelman v. Phil Kingston
No(s). 99-1804 2 reinstatement and backpay provisions. We agree, and reverse those portions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15736 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: GEORGE S. CURRY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14427 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
Courthouse 320 S. Main Street Jefferson, WI 53549 Carla Robinson Clerk of Circuit Court Jefferson County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94230 - 2013-03-13

[MS WORD] JG-1606: Dispositional Order Appointing Guardian (48.977, Wis. Stats.)
/her home, but reunification and further reunification efforts with the child’s parent(s) are unlikely
/formdisplay/JG-1606.doc?formNumber=JG-1606&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-11-25

[PDF] AP002312 CR State v. Ashanti M. Mcalister
2017AP001077 CR State v. James T. Zamber 2017AP001103 CR State v. Dean J. Seppi 2017AP001104 CR State v. Roy S
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226307 - 2018-10-31

[PDF] AP002637 Antjuan Redmond v. Brian Foster
CR State v. Connie Mae Apfel 2016AP000225 CR State v. Brenda S. Webster 2016AP000236 George H. Payne
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181536 - 2016-12-21

CA Blank Order
the circuit court properly accepted B. L.-B.’s no contest waiver of the grounds phase. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148193 - 2015-09-01