Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31211 - 31220 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Todd R. Martin
offense. Martin challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to collaterally attack his first OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20895 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kohler Company v. Village of Kohler
) in which the trial court held that the parties’ 1981 “Projects Construction and Financing Agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12000 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Brian C. Miller
offender. He argues that the trial court improperly restricted his cross-examination of the informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14893 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James G. Langenbach
adduced at trial suggesting that he was suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the crimes. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6773 - 2017-09-20

CA Blank Order
an evidentiary hearing, at which Van Kirk’s trial counsel testified that he employed a “soft touch” strategy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123862 - 2014-10-09

Catherine A. Dellabella v. Dellabella Motors, Inc.
whether there are any material facts in dispute that entitle the opposing party to a trial. Frost v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25192 - 2006-05-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
gone to trial instead of accepting the plea offer. The State argues on appeal that we should
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345091 - 2021-03-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. In the direct appeal that followed, Gallentine’s appointed counsel argued that his trial counsel provided
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193719 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Thomas M. Moss
of an intoxicant (OMVWI). He contends that the trial court should have suppressed evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6086 - 2017-09-19

State v. Rayna J. Bauer
intoxicated, a violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a), as a second offense. Bauer claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5387 - 2005-03-31