Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31231 - 31240 of 62336 for child support.
Search results 31231 - 31240 of 62336 for child support.
State v. Christopher Walker
ineffective assistance of trial counsel; (2) whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8817 - 2005-03-31
ineffective assistance of trial counsel; (2) whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8817 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
is whether sufficient evidence supports the verdict. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129501 - 2014-11-17
is whether sufficient evidence supports the verdict. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129501 - 2014-11-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
argues that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s guilty verdicts for misdemeanor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350844 - 2021-03-31
argues that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s guilty verdicts for misdemeanor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350844 - 2021-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence to support the Commission’s decision concluding otherwise, we affirm the order. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115918 - 2017-09-21
evidence to support the Commission’s decision concluding otherwise, we affirm the order. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115918 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶8 Sheffield insists “[t]he record does not support the claim that endorsement no. 5 was emailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193613 - 2017-09-21
. ¶8 Sheffield insists “[t]he record does not support the claim that endorsement no. 5 was emailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193613 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statement. Another issue counsel raises is whether sufficient evidence supports the verdict
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129501 - 2017-09-21
statement. Another issue counsel raises is whether sufficient evidence supports the verdict
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129501 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David J. Brock
and search of Brock was an unreasonable expansion of the traffic stop not supported by reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7631 - 2017-09-19
and search of Brock was an unreasonable expansion of the traffic stop not supported by reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7631 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for investigative purposes if the officer has a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts that criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670156 - 2023-06-20
for investigative purposes if the officer has a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts that criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670156 - 2023-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 28, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
because the investigative stop that led to his arrest was not supported by either reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63282 - 2011-04-27
because the investigative stop that led to his arrest was not supported by either reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63282 - 2011-04-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
been convicted of disorderly conduct. The trial court did not believe this would support a charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31127 - 2014-09-15
been convicted of disorderly conduct. The trial court did not believe this would support a charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31127 - 2014-09-15