Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31231 - 31240 of 62360 for child support.
Search results 31231 - 31240 of 62360 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
was convicted, not just those facts necessary to support the elements of the specific charge of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
was convicted, not just those facts necessary to support the elements of the specific charge of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
COURT OF APPEALS
supports the court’s findings. The record indicates that a financial disclosure statement was prepared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74244 - 2011-11-21
supports the court’s findings. The record indicates that a financial disclosure statement was prepared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74244 - 2011-11-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was not supported by the community caretaker exception, and therefore the circuit court erred when it denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59077 - 2011-01-19
was not supported by the community caretaker exception, and therefore the circuit court erred when it denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59077 - 2011-01-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
claims that the traffic stop initiated by a police officer was not supported by the community caretaker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59077 - 2014-09-15
claims that the traffic stop initiated by a police officer was not supported by the community caretaker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59077 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). The no-merit report addresses: (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdicts; (2) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132524 - 2017-09-21
). The no-merit report addresses: (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdicts; (2) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132524 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The evaluating psychologist concluded she was unable to support Reese’s plea, and he later withdrew
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144414 - 2017-09-21
. The evaluating psychologist concluded she was unable to support Reese’s plea, and he later withdrew
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144414 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
claimed that he was coerced into pleading guilty during that meeting. In support of the claim, Graham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-15
claimed that he was coerced into pleading guilty during that meeting. In support of the claim, Graham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-15
State v. Napoleon J. Viau
was insufficient to support his convictions. “We review the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12870 - 2005-03-31
was insufficient to support his convictions. “We review the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12870 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the stop. For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that the stop was supported by reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168401 - 2017-09-21
for the stop. For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that the stop was supported by reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168401 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We conclude the evidence did not reasonably support those instructions. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521700 - 2022-05-18
. We conclude the evidence did not reasonably support those instructions. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521700 - 2022-05-18