Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31231 - 31240 of 63539 for records.
Search results 31231 - 31240 of 63539 for records.
CA Blank Order
review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged three grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138273 - 2015-03-23
review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged three grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138273 - 2015-03-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, but he has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909689 - 2025-02-04
a response, but he has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909689 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871729 - 2024-11-07
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871729 - 2024-11-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727998 - 2023-11-14
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727998 - 2023-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
in the record suggesting Hicks was incompetent, and Hicks did not demonstrate any reason to doubt his competence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27238 - 2006-11-27
in the record suggesting Hicks was incompetent, and Hicks did not demonstrate any reason to doubt his competence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27238 - 2006-11-27
State v. John D. Mascaretti
had stipulated to the prior convictions. The record supports this assertion. Furthermore, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15614 - 2005-03-31
had stipulated to the prior convictions. The record supports this assertion. Furthermore, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15614 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we reject the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152324 - 2017-09-21
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we reject the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152324 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the basis that there was nothing in the record suggesting Hicks was incompetent, and Hicks did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27238 - 2014-09-15
on the basis that there was nothing in the record suggesting Hicks was incompetent, and Hicks did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27238 - 2014-09-15
State v. Larry J. Copus
in the record, however, indicates that the State of Wisconsin has lodged a detainer with federal corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12720 - 2005-03-31
in the record, however, indicates that the State of Wisconsin has lodged a detainer with federal corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12720 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145417 - 2015-07-28
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145417 - 2015-07-28