Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31231 - 31240 of 43166 for t o.
Search results 31231 - 31240 of 43166 for t o.
[PDF]
NOTICE
….[I]t was the intent of the trial court to sentence Presley to concurrent time; therefore, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28231 - 2014-09-15
….[I]t was the intent of the trial court to sentence Presley to concurrent time; therefore, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28231 - 2014-09-15
Dane County v. Robert L. Bovee
, the prosecutor asked the officer to complete “the description” and the officer testified: “[t]he tire tracks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6462 - 2005-03-31
, the prosecutor asked the officer to complete “the description” and the officer testified: “[t]he tire tracks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6462 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn E. Avery
the circumstances that provoke suspicion,” as long as “[t]he stop and inquiry [are] reasonably related in scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4227 - 2005-03-31
the circumstances that provoke suspicion,” as long as “[t]he stop and inquiry [are] reasonably related in scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4227 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas E. Fitch
because the court commented that “[t]here is a heavier burden to withdraw a plea when we are dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4720 - 2005-03-31
because the court commented that “[t]here is a heavier burden to withdraw a plea when we are dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4720 - 2005-03-31
Linda Kamm v. Craig Webster
preponderance of the evidence). “[T]he evidence must be viewed most favorably to the findings.” Zeimaitis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13600 - 2005-03-31
preponderance of the evidence). “[T]he evidence must be viewed most favorably to the findings.” Zeimaitis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13600 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the accident did not have it analyzed for fingerprints because the detective said “[i]t slipped [his] mind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108236 - 2014-02-25
the accident did not have it analyzed for fingerprints because the detective said “[i]t slipped [his] mind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108236 - 2014-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
.” So said our supreme court in Trempealeau: [T]he following principles are sound and should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31212 - 2007-12-18
.” So said our supreme court in Trempealeau: [T]he following principles are sound and should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31212 - 2007-12-18
State v. Dwight Gustafson
, 189, 366 N.W.2d 506 (Ct. App. 1985)). Further, "[t]he quantum of information which constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2152 - 2005-03-31
, 189, 366 N.W.2d 506 (Ct. App. 1985)). Further, "[t]he quantum of information which constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2152 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 1, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212149 - 2018-05-01
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 1, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212149 - 2018-05-01
State v. Wilfredo Melo
or money.”[1] As a result, he believed “[t]hat Mr. Melo was involved in narcotics trafficking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11060 - 2005-03-31
or money.”[1] As a result, he believed “[t]hat Mr. Melo was involved in narcotics trafficking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11060 - 2005-03-31