Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31241 - 31250 of 69399 for as he.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was based on contact Slies had with a person he was prohibited from contacting. He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162157 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
on vehicles in November of 2002. He testified that he would install up to 600 doors per shift
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30004 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
’ sentences. He also alleged that he was sentenced on inaccurate information because the district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74185 - 2011-11-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. Because Araujo deemed the interrogatory answers deficient, he filed a motion to compel production
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147173 - 2015-08-24

[PDF] State v. De Mario O.
the jurors overheard the comment and it prejudiced them. He contends that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12214 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
entered Pinkard’s home without a warrant, entered his bedroom while he appeared to be sleeping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36215 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
was the date he sent a letter to the State requesting a child support hearing. Gregory argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26916 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
to a writ because he asserts claims previously resolved in an earlier postconviction proceeding. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98457 - 2013-06-24

State v. Terrance Bernard Davis
a direct appeal in which he raised several arguments: (1) the trial judge was prejudiced against him; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7318 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Howard S. Cleaves
vehicle in a McDonald’s parking lot. When Picard arrived at the parking lot, he observed the car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4970 - 2017-09-19