Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31241 - 31250 of 40013 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 31241 - 31250 of 40013 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statements, as well as Marineau’s objections, and found all of the requested attorney fees to be reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112616 - 2017-09-21
statements, as well as Marineau’s objections, and found all of the requested attorney fees to be reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112616 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2017AP9-CRNM 5 (“[A] consecutive sentence must be supported by ‘a statement of reasons
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219701 - 2018-09-21
. No. 2017AP9-CRNM 5 (“[A] consecutive sentence must be supported by ‘a statement of reasons
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219701 - 2018-09-21
State v. Gary E. Andrashko
. The only attempted justification provided for filing another § 974.06 motion was Andrashko's statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8579 - 2005-03-31
. The only attempted justification provided for filing another § 974.06 motion was Andrashko's statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8579 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Richland School District v. Gerald Cummer
that the indecent touching alleged in the statement of charges in fact took place." As a result, Kessler ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7885 - 2017-09-19
that the indecent touching alleged in the statement of charges in fact took place." As a result, Kessler ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7885 - 2017-09-19
Malcolm, Inc. v. Eau Claire County Board of Land Use Appeals
statements at the March 10, 2004, hearing demonstrate that the board’s analysis was based, in large part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19364 - 2005-08-22
statements at the March 10, 2004, hearing demonstrate that the board’s analysis was based, in large part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19364 - 2005-08-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statements in Albright, Bolstad, and Crandall. ¶12 For all of these reasons, I reject both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165251 - 2017-09-21
statements in Albright, Bolstad, and Crandall. ¶12 For all of these reasons, I reject both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165251 - 2017-09-21
City of Appleton v. David D. Stout
that I don’t have a choice.” Stout further testified that in response to his statement, Vang gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26303 - 2006-08-28
that I don’t have a choice.” Stout further testified that in response to his statement, Vang gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26303 - 2006-08-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The City referred to the Rohner court’s statement that “[t]he legislature intended that a second offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134414 - 2017-09-21
). The City referred to the Rohner court’s statement that “[t]he legislature intended that a second offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134414 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that, based on Flegel’s repeated statements regarding her lack of recollection, it could not give any weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80958 - 2014-09-15
that, based on Flegel’s repeated statements regarding her lack of recollection, it could not give any weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80958 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pleas, his trial lawyer’s failure to seek suppression of his inculpatory statement to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75105 - 2014-09-15
pleas, his trial lawyer’s failure to seek suppression of his inculpatory statement to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75105 - 2014-09-15