Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31251 - 31260 of 62360 for child support.
Search results 31251 - 31260 of 62360 for child support.
State v. Victor Yancey
deliberations; (4) whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict; (5) whether trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10191 - 2005-03-31
deliberations; (4) whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict; (5) whether trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10191 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
claimed that he was coerced into pleading guilty during that meeting. In support of the claim, Graham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2011-06-14
claimed that he was coerced into pleading guilty during that meeting. In support of the claim, Graham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2011-06-14
State v. Napoleon J. Viau
was insufficient to support his convictions. “We review the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12870 - 2007-02-20
was insufficient to support his convictions. “We review the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12870 - 2007-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
whether there is sufficient evidence to support the conviction. When reviewing the sufficiency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106016 - 2017-09-21
whether there is sufficient evidence to support the conviction. When reviewing the sufficiency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106016 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2012AP665 Cir. Ct. No. 2003ME63
of the reasons for the transfer and the facts supporting the transfer and oral and written notice of all
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86770 - 2014-09-15
of the reasons for the transfer and the facts supporting the transfer and oral and written notice of all
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86770 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
when the facts of record support the decision of the [circuit] court.” State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57655 - 2013-03-27
when the facts of record support the decision of the [circuit] court.” State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57655 - 2013-03-27
State v. John C. Clincy
that the evidence at trial did not support his conviction. Because we conclude that the evidence was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12379 - 2005-03-31
that the evidence at trial did not support his conviction. Because we conclude that the evidence was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12379 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 28, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
because the investigative stop that led to his arrest was not supported by either reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63282 - 2011-04-27
because the investigative stop that led to his arrest was not supported by either reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63282 - 2011-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS
was convicted, not just those facts necessary to support the elements of the specific charge of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
was convicted, not just those facts necessary to support the elements of the specific charge of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
COURT OF APPEALS
supports the court’s findings. The record indicates that a financial disclosure statement was prepared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74244 - 2011-11-21
supports the court’s findings. The record indicates that a financial disclosure statement was prepared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74244 - 2011-11-21