Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31251 - 31260 of 67853 for law.

[PDF] State v. Justin David Schwartz
the trial court had the authority to amend the sentence is a question of law. See State v. Martin, 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7220 - 2017-09-20

State v. Kurt R. Caldwell
, and therefore the trial court’s sentence was based on a mistake of law. Accordingly, we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18130 - 2005-05-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
)). This presents a mixed question of law and fact. Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. The circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211869 - 2018-04-26

[PDF] WI APP 218
. It therefore involves a question of law which we review de novo. Schauer v. Baker, 2004 WI App 41, ¶10, 270
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26563 - 2014-09-15

William J. Gregg v. Duane H. Pedersen
the burden of proof upon the true owner to show that it was permissive.”[1] The Pedersens claim the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6756 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
there are no genuine issues of material fact and one party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103820 - 2017-09-21

Terry J. Beaudoin v. James S. Beaudoin
arrives at a conclusion that is one a reasonable judge could reach and consistent with applicable law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2425 - 2005-03-31

State v. Stacey R.W.
. § 48.30(2) and (8) (1999-2000). The question is whether such error was harmless. Wisconsin law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3131 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tecumseh Products Company v. American Employers Insurance Company
there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11933 - 2017-09-21

Ruth Ann Hackman v. First Bank Southeast of Lake Geneva, N.A.
distress. The bank correctly argues that Wisconsin law recognizes no claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10952 - 2005-03-31