Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31251 - 31260 of 44730 for part.

COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing, the trial court denied the motion in part, ordering that Gallipeau would be eligible for SAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141395 - 2015-05-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a lack of values on your part, failure to take responsibility.” ¶9 The court concluded its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66183 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
and efficient administration of justice. Our supreme court stated, in pertinent part: [T]he City has cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45665 - 2010-01-12

COURT OF APPEALS
not contain any part of the record showing the trial court’s reasoning for denying Cardiel’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49247 - 2010-04-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on the nexus between the acts and whether those acts could reasonably be interpreted to be part of “one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032425 - 2025-11-05

COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel has two parts: (1) deficient performance by counsel and (2) prejudice resulting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141758 - 2015-05-13

COURT OF APPEALS
version unless otherwise noted. [2] Michigan Comp. Laws Ann. § 257.625 provides in pertinent part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26593 - 2006-10-03

State v. Lisa Weirick
of guilt to the charge of OMVWI. Wisconsin Stat. § 343.305(4), in pertinent part, merely requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6417 - 2005-03-31

Timothy G. Wolff v. Roger M. Coates
are complied with.” In pertinent part, § 799.207(3)(c) states: The demand for trial must be filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15326 - 2005-03-31

Village of Linden v. Todd N. Nagel
disagree. ¶7 In Collar, 148 Wis.2d at 842-43, 436 N.W.2d at 913, we adopted a three-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15594 - 2005-03-31