Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31251 - 31260 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 31251 - 31260 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
Dorothy Caraher v. City of Menomonie
for discretionary acts, bars the Carahers’ claims. We agree with the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4491 - 2017-09-19
for discretionary acts, bars the Carahers’ claims. We agree with the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4491 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the hearing, Kohlhoff withdrew that claim. Accordingly, we do not address it. No. 2012AP1144-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92889 - 2014-09-15
to the hearing, Kohlhoff withdrew that claim. Accordingly, we do not address it. No. 2012AP1144-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92889 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the Simonson sub- trust. Simonson claims that “the Vaira Sub-trust was favored by receiving materially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210463 - 2018-04-04
and the Simonson sub- trust. Simonson claims that “the Vaira Sub-trust was favored by receiving materially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210463 - 2018-04-04
[PDF]
Steven Derkson v. Troy Haarstick
the respondent, Troy Haarstick. The judgment dismissed Derkson’s claims against two other respondents, Holiday
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2807 - 2017-09-19
the respondent, Troy Haarstick. The judgment dismissed Derkson’s claims against two other respondents, Holiday
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2807 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
Wisconsin’s recreational immunity statute to bar their claims. We disagree and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28128 - 2007-03-27
Wisconsin’s recreational immunity statute to bar their claims. We disagree and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28128 - 2007-03-27
Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
. Spickler argues that the record supports its estoppel claim. We disagree and affirm the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12220 - 2005-03-31
. Spickler argues that the record supports its estoppel claim. We disagree and affirm the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12220 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as a claim for plea withdrawal under Bangert. Even assuming that it was—the position most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955287 - 2025-05-13
as a claim for plea withdrawal under Bangert. Even assuming that it was—the position most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955287 - 2025-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of his confinement. Lanaghan asserted multiple claims, including that he had insufficient time to read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013143 - 2025-09-23
of his confinement. Lanaghan asserted multiple claims, including that he had insufficient time to read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013143 - 2025-09-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
whether the complaint states a claim and the answer joins issue. State v. Dunn, 213 Wis. 2d 363, 368
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152780 - 2017-09-21
whether the complaint states a claim and the answer joins issue. State v. Dunn, 213 Wis. 2d 363, 368
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152780 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court failed to comply with mandatory time limits, thereby
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207169 - 2018-01-16
arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court failed to comply with mandatory time limits, thereby
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207169 - 2018-01-16