Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31261 - 31270 of 63559 for records.
Search results 31261 - 31270 of 63559 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226402 - 2018-11-01
of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226402 - 2018-11-01
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Statutes are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2012AP2138-CRNM 2 record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93152 - 2014-09-15
Statutes are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2012AP2138-CRNM 2 record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93152 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Matthew J. Zei
postconviction testimony contained no justification for that withdrawal. The record as a whole, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3293 - 2017-09-19
postconviction testimony contained no justification for that withdrawal. The record as a whole, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3293 - 2017-09-19
State v. Glenn Eric Rhodes
: “It is a fact of record that the only thing that the defendant-appellant [Rhodes] was in possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14158 - 2005-03-31
: “It is a fact of record that the only thing that the defendant-appellant [Rhodes] was in possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231604 - 2019-01-03
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231604 - 2019-01-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the entire record as required by § 980.09(2), the court found there was not a sufficient basis for a finder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87423 - 2014-09-15
of the entire record as required by § 980.09(2), the court found there was not a sufficient basis for a finder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87423 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214936 - 2018-06-26
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214936 - 2018-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
if the record shows it to be clearly erroneous, after accepting all credibility determinations made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143654 - 2017-09-21
if the record shows it to be clearly erroneous, after accepting all credibility determinations made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143654 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242834 - 2019-07-03
not filed a response. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242834 - 2019-07-03
[PDF]
Judith N. Nolan v. John R. Knight
deputy sheriff’s signature, and a stamp recording the 8:10 a.m., October 15 service date and time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16292 - 2017-09-21
deputy sheriff’s signature, and a stamp recording the 8:10 a.m., October 15 service date and time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16292 - 2017-09-21