Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31271 - 31280 of 59173 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 31271 - 31280 of 59173 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Brodhead Trap Club, Inc. v. Rose M. Heath
and the parties filed opposing motions for summary judgment. Heath claimed that Brodhead’s easement was invalid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13793 - 2005-03-31
and the parties filed opposing motions for summary judgment. Heath claimed that Brodhead’s easement was invalid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13793 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial for, or the functions of various individuals in the criminal justice system. He also claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367776 - 2021-05-18
trial for, or the functions of various individuals in the criminal justice system. He also claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367776 - 2021-05-18
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Watkins
. Thus, this court could summarily reject his claim on the ground that he concedes to the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7642 - 2017-09-19
. Thus, this court could summarily reject his claim on the ground that he concedes to the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7642 - 2017-09-19
State v. William R. Gates
that it was not knowing and voluntary concerning the potential maximum sentence. He claimed that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9333 - 2005-03-31
that it was not knowing and voluntary concerning the potential maximum sentence. He claimed that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9333 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wendi Muehls-Sussman v. Dennis Greenwood
grounds. The Sussmans claim the respondents were not entitled to immunity because they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3033 - 2017-09-19
grounds. The Sussmans claim the respondents were not entitled to immunity because they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3033 - 2017-09-19
State v. John R. Calkins
collaterally challenging the 1995 conviction, claiming that the Walworth county trial court failed to conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6922 - 2005-03-31
collaterally challenging the 1995 conviction, claiming that the Walworth county trial court failed to conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6922 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
for relief, but failed to produce sufficient evidence to support any of his claims. Shonibare first sought
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113119 - 2014-05-22
for relief, but failed to produce sufficient evidence to support any of his claims. Shonibare first sought
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113119 - 2014-05-22
State v. Bobby Chambers
contrary to §§ 943.32(1)(b) & (2) and 939.05, Stats. He claims that the trial court erred: (1) when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10354 - 2005-03-31
contrary to §§ 943.32(1)(b) & (2) and 939.05, Stats. He claims that the trial court erred: (1) when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10354 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ardie Byrd
with one year of jail confinement as a condition. On this appeal, Byrd claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11212 - 2005-03-31
with one year of jail confinement as a condition. On this appeal, Byrd claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11212 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tony G. Merriweather v. Gary R. McCaughtry
in prison. Because we conclude that Merriweather’s claims are moot, and that those capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14932 - 2017-09-21
in prison. Because we conclude that Merriweather’s claims are moot, and that those capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14932 - 2017-09-21