Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31271 - 31280 of 67853 for law.
Search results 31271 - 31280 of 67853 for law.
State v. Quinn Johnson
as the court's decision was reasonable and properly applied the law, the court's determination of admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8342 - 2005-03-31
as the court's decision was reasonable and properly applied the law, the court's determination of admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8342 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
award of interest, exceeding the amount allowed by law, was based on a misrepresentation. The circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763601 - 2024-02-14
award of interest, exceeding the amount allowed by law, was based on a misrepresentation. The circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763601 - 2024-02-14
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel based on the facts is a question of law that we review de novo). Therefore, the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141598 - 2015-05-11
of counsel based on the facts is a question of law that we review de novo). Therefore, the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141598 - 2015-05-11
Sheboygan County v. Andrew C.H.
question regarding the necessity for commitment as one of law because it involves the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16130 - 2005-03-31
question regarding the necessity for commitment as one of law because it involves the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16130 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
attorney knew or should have known that the appeal lacked any reasonable basis in law or equity and could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53999 - 2010-09-01
attorney knew or should have known that the appeal lacked any reasonable basis in law or equity and could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53999 - 2010-09-01
State v. Vincent J. Longo
is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. (quoting State v. King, 175 Wis.2d 146, 150, 499 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14875 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. (quoting State v. King, 175 Wis.2d 146, 150, 499 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14875 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts nor the law support Gorokhovsky’s arguments on appeal, we affirm the judgments and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70326 - 2014-09-15
the facts nor the law support Gorokhovsky’s arguments on appeal, we affirm the judgments and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70326 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Justin David Schwartz
the trial court had the authority to amend the sentence is a question of law. See State v. Martin, 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7220 - 2017-09-20
the trial court had the authority to amend the sentence is a question of law. See State v. Martin, 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7220 - 2017-09-20
State v. Kurt R. Caldwell
, and therefore the trial court’s sentence was based on a mistake of law. Accordingly, we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18130 - 2005-05-16
, and therefore the trial court’s sentence was based on a mistake of law. Accordingly, we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18130 - 2005-05-16
Sydney J. Harris v. Chauncy Steed Harris
the change displayed by these factual findings is substantial is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2606 - 2005-03-31
the change displayed by these factual findings is substantial is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2606 - 2005-03-31