Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31271 - 31280 of 72951 for petition.

State v. Stephen Greer
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11767 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70076 - 2011-08-23

COURT OF APPEALS
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100358 - 2013-09-24

State v. Michael D. Gattie
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20953 - 2006-01-17

COURT OF APPEALS
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30278 - 2007-09-17

Chapter 13 - Interest on Trust Accounts Program
motion or upon petition of any interested party. (2)(a) The board shall accept grant
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1098 - 2013-03-05

Village of Bonduel v. James R. Wind
Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14779 - 2005-03-31

Certification
. That is an “uninsured motor vehicle”. [4] No petition for review was filed in Ruenger v. Soodsma, 2005 WI App 79, 281
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30064 - 2007-08-22

COURT OF APPEALS
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122955 - 2014-10-01

City of Elkhorn v. Jane St. John
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6174 - 2005-03-31