Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31281 - 31290 of 46081 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 31281 - 31290 of 46081 for paternity test paper work.
COURT OF APPEALS
a test that a defendant must meet when bringing a motion for resentencing based on a circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71621 - 2011-10-04
a test that a defendant must meet when bringing a motion for resentencing based on a circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71621 - 2011-10-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. On appeal, the Willans agree that this was the correct legal test. They argue that the barn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=881492 - 2024-11-27
. On appeal, the Willans agree that this was the correct legal test. They argue that the barn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=881492 - 2024-11-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” The test is an objective one: “[W]hether a reasonably prudent [officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31785 - 2014-09-15
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” The test is an objective one: “[W]hether a reasonably prudent [officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31785 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
cause has been found for [Wilke] shooting somebody.” The test on appeal is only whether sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751664 - 2024-01-17
cause has been found for [Wilke] shooting somebody.” The test on appeal is only whether sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751664 - 2024-01-17
State v. Adrian L. Williams
the “manifest injustice” test to withdraw their pleas after sentencing. The holding in Melby remains unchanged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15283 - 2005-03-31
the “manifest injustice” test to withdraw their pleas after sentencing. The holding in Melby remains unchanged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
entitles Schroeder to a new revocation hearing, we must apply the five-prong test required by State ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191011 - 2017-09-21
entitles Schroeder to a new revocation hearing, we must apply the five-prong test required by State ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191011 - 2017-09-21
State v. Leroy H. Hintz
be viewed in light of the “totality of the circumstances,” and not as discrete elements of a more rigid test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2809 - 2005-03-31
be viewed in light of the “totality of the circumstances,” and not as discrete elements of a more rigid test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2809 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the second or third elements of the laches test. Gunn should have been fully aware that a pension division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31964 - 2014-09-15
the second or third elements of the laches test. Gunn should have been fully aware that a pension division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31964 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. If a defendant fails to establish either prong of the Strickland test, we need not determine whether the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69575 - 2011-08-15
. If a defendant fails to establish either prong of the Strickland test, we need not determine whether the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69575 - 2011-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 386 U.S. at 744). The test is not whether the lawyer should expect the argument to prevail. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863177 - 2024-10-14
, 386 U.S. at 744). The test is not whether the lawyer should expect the argument to prevail. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863177 - 2024-10-14