Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31291 - 31300 of 59018 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief. He claims that the circuit court erred when it limited his impeachment of a State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19

[PDF] State v. Matthew T. Doughty
reckless homicide. Doughty also claims the sentence imposed was excessive and disproportionate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6617 - 2017-09-19

Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
of protection and services (CHIPS) under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. He claims that: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2172 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Franklin M.O. v. Sara Lee J.
claims. The trial on visitation and child support began on July 1, 1996. On that date, Sara appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11439 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Moran
was in a state of diabetic shock due to elevated blood sugar levels. His testimony in support of this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12619 - 2017-09-21

City of Milwaukee v. Clifford R. Negley
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11005 - 2005-03-31

Danny L. Schroeder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
, vehicles involved, persons covered, claims made, vehicles insured, or premiums paid, the limits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3552 - 2005-03-31

State v. Alfonso Taylor
to a crime. Taylor claims that the trial court erred when it: (1) denied his motion for a mistrial; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5437 - 2005-03-31

Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
of protection and services (CHIPS) under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. He claims that: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2173 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Roland F. Sarko v. Examining Board of Architects
prominent. ¶16 Sarko claims that he was not required to monument the angle point because it fell within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3892 - 2017-09-20