Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31291 - 31300 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 31291 - 31300 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 10, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31447 - 2008-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 10, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31447 - 2008-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS
the mitigating factors and the weaknesses identified in the State’s case, the prosecutor wanted the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68268 - 2011-07-25
the mitigating factors and the weaknesses identified in the State’s case, the prosecutor wanted the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68268 - 2011-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
] petition to this court, we nonetheless affirm. ¶2 The State charged Flowers in two different cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35125 - 2009-01-13
] petition to this court, we nonetheless affirm. ¶2 The State charged Flowers in two different cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35125 - 2009-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 9, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28910 - 2007-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 9, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28910 - 2007-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
intercourse requires this court to reverse his conviction for that count and remand the case to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142637 - 2015-06-01
intercourse requires this court to reverse his conviction for that count and remand the case to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142637 - 2015-06-01
COURT OF APPEALS
not the way this Court saw the facts and made the findings in the case.” The court reaffirmed its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72468 - 2011-10-19
not the way this Court saw the facts and made the findings in the case.” The court reaffirmed its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72468 - 2011-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS
prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. This court would never punish someone for exercising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35919 - 2009-03-23
prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. This court would never punish someone for exercising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35919 - 2009-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 9, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36116 - 2009-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 9, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36116 - 2009-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts in a number of Wisconsin cases where the court determined that an officer had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100249 - 2013-07-31
the facts in a number of Wisconsin cases where the court determined that an officer had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100249 - 2013-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 28, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30095 - 2007-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 28, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30095 - 2007-08-27