Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31291 - 31300 of 57351 for id.

[PDF] Wisconsin Worker's Compensation Uninsured Employers Fund v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. See id. We will uphold LIRC’s findings of fact if they are supported by substantial and credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4961 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Ladarwin D. Copeland
background” from an original sentencing. Id. Reconfinement is distinguished from original sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25908 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] OPEIU v. Portage County
evidence. Id. at 102-03. Essentially, the court’s role is supervisory in nature—to insure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19407 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. Id. However, whether the change is substantial is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76793 - 2012-01-18

CA Blank Order
factor is a question of law. Id., ¶33. If the facts do not constitute a new factor as a matter of law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133042 - 2015-01-20

State v. Ronnell Wallace
of the transcripts can be reconstructed. Id. at 103, 401 N.W.2d at 753. Only if the record cannot be reconstructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8101 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
responsibility.” Id., ¶36. “The initial decision on joinder is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06

COURT OF APPEALS
a warrantless blood draw. See id., ¶22. We observed that the officer in Reese was following clear and settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110417 - 2014-04-16

State v. Ladarwin D. Copeland
and meaningful difference in [its] procedural background” from an original sentencing. Id. Reconfinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25908 - 2006-08-29

OPEIU v. Portage County
is shown by clear and convincing evidence. Id. at 102-03. Essentially, the court’s role is supervisory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19407 - 2005-08-24