Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3131 - 3140 of 29985 for de.

[PDF] Fredric P. Spindler v. Bonita B. Spindler
, in the form of labor, were of de minimis value and were insufficient to change the character of the cottage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10451 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
forth in the relevant statutes is a question of law, which we review de novo. Coston, 222 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379752 - 2021-06-22

COURT OF APPEALS
should be reviewed de novo, or at least under the due weight standard in reviewing whether Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33192 - 2008-08-26

[PDF] State v. Yolanda L.
-2844 02-2845 02-2846 6 of law reviewed de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5810 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Perry Margoles v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
, or reviewed de novo. We conclude that LIRC’s decision is entitled to great weight deference. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12043 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Ruffin, 2022 WI 34, ¶35, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 974 N.W.2d 432. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542422 - 2022-07-13

Badger III Limited Partnership v. Howard
this action. Although this is a legal issue that we decide de novo, see Green Scapular Crusade, Inc. v. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8135 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Gordon K. Aaron v. Byron Axel
. ¶13 We review the trial court's decision to grant summary judgment de novo. See Barillari v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2343 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kelley D. Avery
to due process is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Pettit, 171 Wis.2d 627, 639, 492
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13101 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review de novo. See id., ¶9. Here, as the circuit court explained in its postconviction order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263486 - 2020-06-09