Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3131 - 3140 of 29821 for des.
Search results 3131 - 3140 of 29821 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts as found by the [circuit] court meet the constitutional standard” is reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122397 - 2014-09-25
the facts as found by the [circuit] court meet the constitutional standard” is reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122397 - 2014-09-25
2010 WI APP 25
of the Board, not that of the circuit court, and we do so de novo. State ex rel. Sprewell v. McCaughtry, 226
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45402 - 2010-02-23
of the Board, not that of the circuit court, and we do so de novo. State ex rel. Sprewell v. McCaughtry, 226
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45402 - 2010-02-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶7 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96628 - 2014-09-15
. ¶7 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96628 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jeffrey Allen v. Waukesha County Board of Adjustment
conducts a de novo review of the board’s decision. See Miswald v. Waukesha County Bd. of Adjustment, 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11666 - 2017-09-19
conducts a de novo review of the board’s decision. See Miswald v. Waukesha County Bd. of Adjustment, 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11666 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Hilary H. Koch, Jr.
and oral argument by Mark S. Des Rochers of Lawrence & Des Rochers, S.C. of St. Nazianz. On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7870 - 2017-09-19
and oral argument by Mark S. Des Rochers of Lawrence & Des Rochers, S.C. of St. Nazianz. On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7870 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Perry Margoles v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
, or reviewed de novo. We conclude that LIRC’s decision is entitled to great weight deference. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12043 - 2017-09-21
, or reviewed de novo. We conclude that LIRC’s decision is entitled to great weight deference. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12043 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of federal courts review the first factor de novo, although any factual findings relevant to this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963881 - 2025-06-03
of federal courts review the first factor de novo, although any factual findings relevant to this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963881 - 2025-06-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review the court’s decision de novo. State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones, 2000 WI App 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771763 - 2024-03-07
review the court’s decision de novo. State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones, 2000 WI App 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771763 - 2024-03-07
City of Waukesha v. Town Board of the Town of
of a conditional use permit for a commercial PUD in a residential district was a “de facto rezoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7814 - 2005-03-31
of a conditional use permit for a commercial PUD in a residential district was a “de facto rezoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7814 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 125
customarily occupied. ¶2 The Board claims that WERC’s decision should be reviewed de novo, or at least
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33192 - 2014-09-15
customarily occupied. ¶2 The Board claims that WERC’s decision should be reviewed de novo, or at least
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33192 - 2014-09-15