Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3131 - 3140 of 29942 for des.
Search results 3131 - 3140 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requested a trial de novo pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). Following a two-day trial de novo, the Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239681 - 2019-04-25
requested a trial de novo pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). Following a two-day trial de novo, the Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239681 - 2019-04-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of federal courts review the first factor de novo, although any factual findings relevant to this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963881 - 2025-06-03
of federal courts review the first factor de novo, although any factual findings relevant to this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963881 - 2025-06-03
2011 WI APP 2
. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58086 - 2011-01-30
. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58086 - 2011-01-30
[PDF]
WI APP 127
as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s ruling on summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101998 - 2017-09-21
as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s ruling on summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101998 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dennis J. King
review de novo. See Bank of Barron v. Gieseke, 169 Wis.2d 437, 454-55, 485 N.W.2d 426, 432 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11467 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See Bank of Barron v. Gieseke, 169 Wis.2d 437, 454-55, 485 N.W.2d 426, 432 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11467 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jeffrey Allen v. Waukesha County Board of Adjustment
conducts a de novo review of the board’s decision. See Miswald v. Waukesha County Bd. of Adjustment, 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11666 - 2017-09-19
conducts a de novo review of the board’s decision. See Miswald v. Waukesha County Bd. of Adjustment, 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11666 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Eleanor Delach v. County of Price
. The interpretation of an unambiguous contract is a question of law we review de novo. Schlosser v. Allis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14249 - 2014-09-15
. The interpretation of an unambiguous contract is a question of law we review de novo. Schlosser v. Allis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14249 - 2014-09-15
State v. Davon R. Malcom
the proper legal standard is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Finally, the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3646 - 2005-03-31
the proper legal standard is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Finally, the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3646 - 2005-03-31
Community Development Authority v. Racine County Condemnation Commission
, a procedure which we review de novo, inquiring whether the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21170 - 2006-03-22
, a procedure which we review de novo, inquiring whether the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21170 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and, therefore, summary judgment on the issue of grounds was not appropriate. ¶17 This court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181450 - 2017-09-21
and, therefore, summary judgment on the issue of grounds was not appropriate. ¶17 This court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181450 - 2017-09-21