Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3131 - 3140 of 29722 for des.

[PDF] Diamondback Funding, LLC v. Chili's of Wisconsin, Inc.
, 440 N.W.2d 825, 827 (Ct. App. 1989). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6845 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Norman S. De Ruyter v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for review filed NORMAN S. DE RUYTER, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6923 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
exists is also a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶9 In determining that the easement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93997 - 2013-03-11

WI App 73 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2167 Complete Title ...
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63155 - 2012-01-22

[PDF] Walgreen Co. v. Wisconsin Pharmacy Examining Board
to the agency’s interpretation; we will review it de novo, giving it “no weight at all.” UFE, 201 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12526 - 2017-09-21

State v. James E. Thomas
to relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. “[I]f the defendant fails to allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14398 - 2005-03-31

Perry Margoles v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Margoles argues that LIRC’s decision should be either accorded due weight deference, or reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12043 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910653 - 2025-02-04

Jessica C. v. State
. Although our review of the trial court's decision is de novo, see De Bruin v. State, 140 Wis.2d 631, 635
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10462 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Patricia M. Klinger v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company
. No. 2004AP1704 4 DISCUSSION ¶7 Our standard of review is de novo for two reasons. First, insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17788 - 2017-09-21