Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3131 - 3140 of 44727 for part.

[PDF] Public Reprimand With Consent
of the intimate parts of a person. Because no prior consensual relationship existed, this conduct would have
/services/public/lawyerreg/statuspublic/howard.pdf - 2022-11-03

Hector Cubero v. Record Custodian
, § 19.37(2)(b), provides: [i]n any action filed under sub. (1) relating to access to a record or part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7872 - 2005-03-31

Pamela Jones v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
of the terms and conditions that the coverage is subject to. ¶7 Part III of the policy relates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19587 - 2005-09-12

[PDF] County of Taylor v. Dustin David Hamland
of the Wisconsin Constitution provides in pertinent part that “the circuit court shall have original jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14121 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Morris F. Clement
. Raymond Wood, testified that his opinion was based in part on a written statement by Clement’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5969 - 2017-09-19

Larry George v. Grace Brown
) relating to access to a record or part of a record under s. 19.35(1)(am), if the court finds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7813 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brady B.
it to say that the acts were consensual on the part of both Brady and the female and that the female also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14191 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. De'Andrus N.
by the use of any body part or object, of the complainant’s or defendant’s intimate parts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6616 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] David S. Frederick v. Columbia Correctional Institution
the argument, the court set forth a two-part test: 1. Whether § DOC 302.14 applies retroactively; and 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8966 - 2017-09-19

Stephen Sills v. Wisconsin Department of Administration
as part of the 1997 budget bill because the Black Point legislation is a “private” or “local” law within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18310 - 2005-05-25