Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3131 - 3140 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 3131 - 3140 of 58492 for speedy trial.
George T. Stathus v. James H. Horst
in connection with the sale by Horst and Edwards of their house to the Stathuses. After a bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2468 - 2005-03-31
in connection with the sale by Horst and Edwards of their house to the Stathuses. After a bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2468 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
George T. Stathus v. James H. Horst
of their house to the Stathuses. After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2468 - 2017-09-19
of their house to the Stathuses. After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2468 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion, which challenged his sentence. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82919 - 2014-09-15
denying his postconviction motion, which challenged his sentence. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82919 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 49
judgment of conviction, entered upon a jury’s verdict, as well as an order of the trial court denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215703 - 2018-09-07
judgment of conviction, entered upon a jury’s verdict, as well as an order of the trial court denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215703 - 2018-09-07
State v. John E. Olson
appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for four counts of first-degree sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11160 - 2005-03-31
appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for four counts of first-degree sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11160 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 165
of the parties’ house-moving contract. Shadley cross-appeals from the same judgment arguing that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42630 - 2011-02-07
of the parties’ house-moving contract. Shadley cross-appeals from the same judgment arguing that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42630 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for an incident occurring in July 2012. For the attempted crime, the trial court imposed a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145015 - 2017-09-21
for an incident occurring in July 2012. For the attempted crime, the trial court imposed a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145015 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
by use of force for an incident occurring in July 2012. For the attempted crime, the trial court imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145015 - 2015-07-21
by use of force for an incident occurring in July 2012. For the attempted crime, the trial court imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145015 - 2015-07-21
[PDF]
WI APP 165
the same judgment arguing that the trial court erred in: (1) construing two contract terms, “expected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42630 - 2014-09-15
the same judgment arguing that the trial court erred in: (1) construing two contract terms, “expected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42630 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, intelligent, and voluntary because he did not understand he was admitting an intent to kill; and (2) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251749 - 2019-12-27
, intelligent, and voluntary because he did not understand he was admitting an intent to kill; and (2) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251749 - 2019-12-27