Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3131 - 3140 of 20930 for word.
Search results 3131 - 3140 of 20930 for word.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on a broad interpretation of those words,” and that interpreting Eagle Cove’s proposed Bible camp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728997 - 2023-11-14
on a broad interpretation of those words,” and that interpreting Eagle Cove’s proposed Bible camp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728997 - 2023-11-14
[PDF]
Mary J. Gittel v. Ruth M. Abram
, and our first resort is to the language of the statute itself. Id. If the words of the statute convey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3893 - 2017-09-20
, and our first resort is to the language of the statute itself. Id. If the words of the statute convey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3893 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI App 29
basis; or (d) the interpretation “directly contravenes the words of the ordinance” or rule. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211341 - 2018-09-18
basis; or (d) the interpretation “directly contravenes the words of the ordinance” or rule. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211341 - 2018-09-18
[PDF]
WI App 61
of any property taken. Neither side in this appeal argues that any interpretation of the word “return
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714113 - 2023-12-19
of any property taken. Neither side in this appeal argues that any interpretation of the word “return
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714113 - 2023-12-19
Mary J. Gittel v. Ruth M. Abram
of the statute itself. Id. If the words of the statute convey the legislative intent, that ends our inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3893 - 2005-03-31
of the statute itself. Id. If the words of the statute convey the legislative intent, that ends our inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3893 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 51
that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987268 - 2025-09-23
that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987268 - 2025-09-23
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, except that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=822752 - 2024-09-09
, except that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=822752 - 2024-09-09
[PDF]
Patricia Wischer v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc.
the malicious acts, they [sic] could have. All they changed was the word reckless disregard into intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3849 - 2017-09-20
the malicious acts, they [sic] could have. All they changed was the word reckless disregard into intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3849 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Patricia Wischer v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc.
the malicious acts, they [sic] could have. All they changed was the word reckless disregard into intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4384 - 2017-09-19
the malicious acts, they [sic] could have. All they changed was the word reckless disregard into intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4384 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Patricia Wischer v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc.
the malicious acts, they [sic] could have. All they changed was the word reckless disregard into intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3731 - 2017-09-19
the malicious acts, they [sic] could have. All they changed was the word reckless disregard into intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3731 - 2017-09-19