Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31321 - 31330 of 97795 for civil court case status online.
Search results 31321 - 31330 of 97795 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
court properly rejected it. A buyer makes a prima facie case for failure of essential purpose when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108062 - 2014-02-18
court properly rejected it. A buyer makes a prima facie case for failure of essential purpose when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108062 - 2014-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court impose sentences for the second-degree sexual assaults “consecutive to the escape case.” Parrett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31113 - 2007-12-10
that the court impose sentences for the second-degree sexual assaults “consecutive to the escape case.” Parrett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31113 - 2007-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
the right to counsel …. The court shall in all cases require the appointment of an attorney as guardian ad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29292 - 2007-06-06
the right to counsel …. The court shall in all cases require the appointment of an attorney as guardian ad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29292 - 2007-06-06
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 15, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29049 - 2007-05-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 15, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29049 - 2007-05-14
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts and circumstances of this case support the trial court’s decision to enter the order, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32347 - 2008-04-07
the facts and circumstances of this case support the trial court’s decision to enter the order, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32347 - 2008-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 15, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70955 - 2011-09-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 15, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70955 - 2011-09-14
COURT OF APPEALS
, withdrew his request for a trial de novo and stipulated that the court decide the case based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50828 - 2010-06-09
, withdrew his request for a trial de novo and stipulated that the court decide the case based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50828 - 2010-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 29, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107360 - 2014-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 29, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107360 - 2014-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence. The court ruled on the motion only shortly after Comstock had begun presenting his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31258 - 2007-12-19
evidence. The court ruled on the motion only shortly after Comstock had begun presenting his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31258 - 2007-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court erred “in informing the jury that they must accept an essential element of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121253 - 2014-09-08
the trial court erred “in informing the jury that they must accept an essential element of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121253 - 2014-09-08

