Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31351 - 31360 of 61989 for child support.
Search results 31351 - 31360 of 61989 for child support.
State v. Michael James Last
should have been given in support of the theory of defense. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 Last
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4895 - 2005-03-31
should have been given in support of the theory of defense. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 Last
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4895 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
findings based on Paris’s and his trial counsel’s testimony which amply support this conclusion. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36405 - 2009-05-04
findings based on Paris’s and his trial counsel’s testimony which amply support this conclusion. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36405 - 2009-05-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
to support a bind over on the felony counts of theft by false representation. We agree with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28533 - 2014-09-15
to support a bind over on the felony counts of theft by false representation. We agree with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28533 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
he has lived since infancy; that she and her husband are raising and supporting Hollingsworth’s son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50322 - 2010-05-25
he has lived since infancy; that she and her husband are raising and supporting Hollingsworth’s son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50322 - 2010-05-25
[PDF]
WI App 80
of discretion to support the surcharge. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s ruling requiring Cherry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32344 - 2014-09-15
of discretion to support the surcharge. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s ruling requiring Cherry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32344 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of facts are upheld unless clearly erroneous and not supported by the record. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77700 - 2014-09-15
court’s findings of facts are upheld unless clearly erroneous and not supported by the record. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77700 - 2014-09-15
State v. William S. Purdy
not support the conviction. This court disagrees and affirms the conviction. ¶2 While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4006 - 2005-03-31
not support the conviction. This court disagrees and affirms the conviction. ¶2 While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4006 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that there is no arguable merit to challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the verdicts. Appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631222 - 2023-03-14
that there is no arguable merit to challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the verdicts. Appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631222 - 2023-03-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the record to support his contention that he had an ownership interest in the property for any of the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115308 - 2017-09-21
in the record to support his contention that he had an ownership interest in the property for any of the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115308 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
evidence to support one of the elements of the burglary No. 2008AP879 2 charge for which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34768 - 2014-09-15
evidence to support one of the elements of the burglary No. 2008AP879 2 charge for which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34768 - 2014-09-15