Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31361 - 31370 of 67037 for ct.

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
N.W.2d 854 (Ct. App. 1996) (“A trial court’s decision to grant leave to amend a complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027277 - 2025-10-22

State v. Jeffrey Joseph Dake
result at a new trial. See State v. Brunton, 203 Wis.2d 195, 200, 552 N.W.2d 452, 455 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14809 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas M. Fischer
review de novo. See State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis.2d 101, 106, 571 N.W.2d 417, 419 (Ct. App. 1997). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14460 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2008AP455 Cir. Ct. No. 2007SC1501 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33449 - 2008-07-21

State v. Robert T. Barnard
. Appeal No. 04-0968-CR Cir. Ct. No. 02CT001196 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7451 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2012AP2060-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2012CT33 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94137 - 2013-03-13

State v. Ernest K. Knox
(Ct. App. 1986).[3] In Poole, “the evil was not the lack of enthusiastic advocacy for the bargained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12179 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael R. Bender
, 543 N.W.2d 555, 557 (Ct. App. 1995). The starting point in statutory construction is the plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12356 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
two different page numbers” on every page of a brief. S. CT. ORDER 20-07 cmt. at x1. Finally, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917151 - 2025-02-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2012AP1468 Cir. Ct. No. 2005CI1 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93285 - 2014-09-15