Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31371 - 31380 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 31371 - 31380 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
David M. Iushewitz v. Milwaukee County PersonnelReview Board
, we grant Iushewitz's motion seeking appeal costs, fees, and attorney fees. We remand this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8541 - 2005-03-31
, we grant Iushewitz's motion seeking appeal costs, fees, and attorney fees. We remand this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8541 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Medrano relied was not retroactively applicable to his case and, in any event, his motion was precluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36148 - 2014-09-15
Medrano relied was not retroactively applicable to his case and, in any event, his motion was precluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36148 - 2014-09-15
Welding Shop, Ltd. v. Silent Stalker, Inc.
and bar recovery in this case. The Welding Shop argues that Northridge is controlling. In Northridge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14675 - 2005-03-31
and bar recovery in this case. The Welding Shop argues that Northridge is controlling. In Northridge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14675 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
required to prove prosecutorial overreaching are not present in this case. We agree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233481 - 2019-01-29
required to prove prosecutorial overreaching are not present in this case. We agree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233481 - 2019-01-29
Steven E. Mariades v. Marquette County
, and we held our decision in abeyance pending issuance of the supreme court’s opinion in a case raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13354 - 2005-03-31
, and we held our decision in abeyance pending issuance of the supreme court’s opinion in a case raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13354 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kraig V. Carter
. The State responds that Gallion does not control this case because Carter was sentenced before Gallion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20323 - 2008-08-13
. The State responds that Gallion does not control this case because Carter was sentenced before Gallion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20323 - 2008-08-13
Mark Olsen v. Edward Hoffmann
, and that the case should be reopened because Zehetner v. Chrysler Fin. Co., LLC, 2004 WI App 80, 272 Wis. 2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24751 - 2006-04-10
, and that the case should be reopened because Zehetner v. Chrysler Fin. Co., LLC, 2004 WI App 80, 272 Wis. 2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24751 - 2006-04-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
at the case, she found this statement in the court docket entries: “Jury question received, answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42498 - 2014-09-15
at the case, she found this statement in the court docket entries: “Jury question received, answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42498 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Wolf
in a case, upon its own motion or the motion of any party, if the ends of justice served by taking action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16196 - 2017-09-21
in a case, upon its own motion or the motion of any party, if the ends of justice served by taking action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16196 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Murray
under the circumstances presented by this case to set a parole eligibility date if I sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9682 - 2017-09-19
under the circumstances presented by this case to set a parole eligibility date if I sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9682 - 2017-09-19