Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31381 - 31390 of 52742 for address.
Search results 31381 - 31390 of 52742 for address.
CA Blank Order
, 403 N.W.2d 449 (1987), aff’d, 486 U.S. 429 (1988). The no-merit report addresses the validity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146200 - 2015-08-10
, 403 N.W.2d 449 (1987), aff’d, 486 U.S. 429 (1988). The no-merit report addresses the validity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146200 - 2015-08-10
COURT OF APPEALS
Our decision makes it unnecessary to address the arguments concerning Garcia’s claim of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33804 - 2008-08-20
Our decision makes it unnecessary to address the arguments concerning Garcia’s claim of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33804 - 2008-08-20
Wallace A. Stellrecht v. Donald W. Gudmanson
was extremely important to Stellrecht’s theory of defense and that Williams was ineffective for not addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2499 - 2005-03-31
was extremely important to Stellrecht’s theory of defense and that Williams was ineffective for not addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2499 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, to the extent that this opinion does not address any arguments that Collins means to pursue in his brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069253 - 2026-01-29
, to the extent that this opinion does not address any arguments that Collins means to pursue in his brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069253 - 2026-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
addresses two issues: whether there would be arguable merit to appealing the validity of Echols’ pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=899706 - 2025-01-14
addresses two issues: whether there would be arguable merit to appealing the validity of Echols’ pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=899706 - 2025-01-14
[PDF]
State v. James Robert Schroeder
by their subsequent note sent to the trial court addressing this precise issue. The trial court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8218 - 2017-09-19
by their subsequent note sent to the trial court addressing this precise issue. The trial court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8218 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Appellate counsel’s no-merit report addresses two issues: (1) whether Stoneburner’s no-contest plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
. Appellate counsel’s no-merit report addresses two issues: (1) whether Stoneburner’s no-contest plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). “A request for restitution is addressed to the [circuit] court’s discretion.” See id. at 329. Lee’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189685 - 2017-09-21
). “A request for restitution is addressed to the [circuit] court’s discretion.” See id. at 329. Lee’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189685 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses the assistance of trial counsel, whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218617 - 2018-08-31
, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses the assistance of trial counsel, whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218617 - 2018-08-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and that such performance prejudiced his defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). We need not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30636 - 2007-10-17
and that such performance prejudiced his defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). We need not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30636 - 2007-10-17