Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31381 - 31390 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 31381 - 31390 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
by the circuit court, which analyzed the case using the principles of probable cause to search. Notwithstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124830 - 2014-10-27
by the circuit court, which analyzed the case using the principles of probable cause to search. Notwithstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124830 - 2014-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90571 - 2012-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90571 - 2012-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
In the present case, the circuit court’s original oral pronouncement of the terms of the injunction did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29171 - 2007-05-23
In the present case, the circuit court’s original oral pronouncement of the terms of the injunction did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29171 - 2007-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 26, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32223 - 2008-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 26, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32223 - 2008-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, we do not decide that issue at this time because we are remanding this case to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83169 - 2012-05-30
. However, we do not decide that issue at this time because we are remanding this case to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83169 - 2012-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case to run concurrently with the sentence he was then serving. The circuit court denied Walker’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55693 - 2010-10-20
in this case to run concurrently with the sentence he was then serving. The circuit court denied Walker’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55693 - 2010-10-20
COURT OF APPEALS
“to submit evidence and facts supporting his case,” because he contacted the court on the date of the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122278 - 2014-09-22
“to submit evidence and facts supporting his case,” because he contacted the court on the date of the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122278 - 2014-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
the close of Hilger’s case in chief, with the same result. However, after the close of evidence, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117397 - 2014-07-21
the close of Hilger’s case in chief, with the same result. However, after the close of evidence, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117397 - 2014-07-21
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 28, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98731 - 2013-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 28, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98731 - 2013-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106035 - 2013-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106035 - 2013-12-26