Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31391 - 31400 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 31391 - 31400 of 58483 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06) [2] postconviction motion by which he sought a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33619 - 2008-08-04
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06) [2] postconviction motion by which he sought a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33619 - 2008-08-04
[PDF]
James L. Ard v. Patricia A. Ard
of divorce, arguing that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25724 - 2017-09-21
of divorce, arguing that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25724 - 2017-09-21
State v. Allen F. Ringelstetter
offense, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). He contends the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6000 - 2005-03-31
offense, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). He contends the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6000 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
waived his rights to a jury trial and to testify; and (3) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109467 - 2017-09-21
waived his rights to a jury trial and to testify; and (3) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109467 - 2017-09-21
Paul Evers v. Everett Fryer
of Evers's security deposit. The trial court held that an accord and satisfaction existed after Evers cashed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8851 - 2005-03-31
of Evers's security deposit. The trial court held that an accord and satisfaction existed after Evers cashed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8851 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, Phoudavong argued that the trial court did not address “cultural considerations” when it sentenced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30580 - 2007-10-15
, Phoudavong argued that the trial court did not address “cultural considerations” when it sentenced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30580 - 2007-10-15
State v. John A. Mosley, Sr.
the trial court erred in not granting Mosley's motion to suppress the cocaine.[1] We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12089 - 2005-03-31
the trial court erred in not granting Mosley's motion to suppress the cocaine.[1] We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12089 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brown County v. Matthew W.G.
§ 51.20, STATS. He claims the trial court failed to consider that his primary need was treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15929 - 2017-09-21
§ 51.20, STATS. He claims the trial court failed to consider that his primary need was treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15929 - 2017-09-21
State v. Pierre Davis
). However, Davis's postconviction motion alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel in failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9668 - 2005-03-31
). However, Davis's postconviction motion alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel in failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9668 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dolores Haas v. Thomas J. Berube
. § 806.07(1)(b) motion for a new trial. Because Haas has met her burden of proving that the newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2262 - 2017-09-19
. § 806.07(1)(b) motion for a new trial. Because Haas has met her burden of proving that the newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2262 - 2017-09-19