Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3141 - 3150 of 15237 for 2013.
Search results 3141 - 3150 of 15237 for 2013.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159831 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159831 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147480 - 2015-09-01
filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147480 - 2015-09-01
CA Blank Order
and as a repeater. Conroy’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138594 - 2015-03-31
and as a repeater. Conroy’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138594 - 2015-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2013-14). 1 We affirm the order of the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168970 - 2017-09-21
(2013-14). 1 We affirm the order of the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168970 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 346.63(1)(a) (2013-14). 1 Rauch’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150697 - 2017-09-21
. § 346.63(1)(a) (2013-14). 1 Rauch’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150697 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
under WIS. STAT. § 907.04 (2013- 14), 1 which provides: “Testimony in the form of an opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162379 - 2017-09-21
under WIS. STAT. § 907.04 (2013- 14), 1 which provides: “Testimony in the form of an opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162379 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14),[1] and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146229 - 2015-08-18
appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14),[1] and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146229 - 2015-08-18
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14).[1] We affirm. ¶2 The State alleged that Adeyanju was one of a number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144530 - 2015-07-15
. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14).[1] We affirm. ¶2 The State alleged that Adeyanju was one of a number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144530 - 2015-07-15
CA Blank Order
. § 946.49(1)(a)) (2013-14).[1] Johnson was advised of his right to respond to the report and has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138598 - 2015-03-30
. § 946.49(1)(a)) (2013-14).[1] Johnson was advised of his right to respond to the report and has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138598 - 2015-03-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of interspousal battery or domestic abuse. See Wis. Stat. § 767.41(2)(d)(1) (2013-14).[1] We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137623 - 2015-03-16
of interspousal battery or domestic abuse. See Wis. Stat. § 767.41(2)(d)(1) (2013-14).[1] We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137623 - 2015-03-16