Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3141 - 3150 of 29547 for er.

State v. Patricia LaBelle
)(a) and 943.20(3)(b), Stats. LaBelle raises three claims of error: (1) the trial court erred in refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13704 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Daniel Smith
for postconviction relief. He raises four issues for review—whether the trial court: (1) erred when it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10827 - 2017-09-20

Lawson Bender v. Karmen Lindhal
, the requirements of § 853.03(2), Stats., were not satisfied, and the trial court erred in concluding otherwise. We
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8397 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of New Berlin v. Dennis Barker
that the circuit court erred when reversing a municipal court ruling granting his motion to dismiss based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6138 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] City of New Berlin v. Dennis Barker
that the circuit court erred when reversing a municipal court ruling granting his motion to dismiss based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6137 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Greg A. Mayer
postconviction relief. Mayer argues that the trial court erred by submitting a witness’s statement to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13403 - 2017-09-21

State v. Daniel Smith
: (1) erred when it failed to give a lesser-included offense jury instruction for felony murder; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10827 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Harley Paws, Inc. v. Mohns, Inc.
in damages, following a court trial. Mohns argues that the trial court erred in finding that it breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3265 - 2017-09-19

State v. Johnson W. Greybuffalo
] Greybuffalo argues the trial court erred by refusing to submit the lesser-included felony murder instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9567 - 2005-03-31

Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
of protection and services (CHIPS) under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. He claims that: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2172 - 2005-03-31