Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3141 - 3150 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 3141 - 3150 of 24568 for extending.
State v. Joshua J. Alderman
Alderman because he believed the recommended extended supervision was to be imposed concurrent to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20459 - 2005-11-30
Alderman because he believed the recommended extended supervision was to be imposed concurrent to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20459 - 2005-11-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion to withdraw, and dismiss the appeal. 2 We also extend the time for Threets to file a new WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194586 - 2017-09-21
motion to withdraw, and dismiss the appeal. 2 We also extend the time for Threets to file a new WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194586 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
prejudice, and extend the deadline for Thompson to file a postconviction motion. Thompson asserts in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223922 - 2018-10-22
prejudice, and extend the deadline for Thompson to file a postconviction motion. Thompson asserts in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223922 - 2018-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
and ten years of extended supervision). The circuit court rejected Murray’s ineffective assistance claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97639 - 2013-06-04
and ten years of extended supervision). The circuit court rejected Murray’s ineffective assistance claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97639 - 2013-06-04
State v. Thomas J. Mola
check charge. On October 29, 1997, we extended the time for Mola to file a motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13860 - 2005-03-31
check charge. On October 29, 1997, we extended the time for Mola to file a motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13860 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
months’ initial confinement and eighteen months’ extended supervision to run consecutive to Andrews
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204676 - 2017-12-06
months’ initial confinement and eighteen months’ extended supervision to run consecutive to Andrews
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204676 - 2017-12-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
years of confinement and three years of extended supervision. The court imposed a consecutive three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96373 - 2014-09-15
years of confinement and three years of extended supervision. The court imposed a consecutive three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96373 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to twelve years and six months of initial confinement followed by seven years and six months of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242959 - 2019-06-27
to twelve years and six months of initial confinement followed by seven years and six months of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242959 - 2019-06-27
CA Blank Order
recommend one year of initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision on each count, to be served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118128 - 2014-07-22
recommend one year of initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision on each count, to be served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118128 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was sentenced to concurrent terms of fourteen years’ initial confinement, ten years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91196 - 2014-09-15
was sentenced to concurrent terms of fourteen years’ initial confinement, ten years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91196 - 2014-09-15