Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3141 - 3150 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 3141 - 3150 of 24568 for extending.
G-Store, Inc. v. Department of Commerce
order, but extending the compliance deadline until September 1, 1999. The order also clarified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4182 - 2005-03-31
order, but extending the compliance deadline until September 1, 1999. The order also clarified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4182 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joshua J. Alderman
Alderman because he believed the recommended extended supervision was to be imposed concurrent to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20459 - 2005-11-30
Alderman because he believed the recommended extended supervision was to be imposed concurrent to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20459 - 2005-11-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
years of confinement and three years of extended supervision. The court imposed a consecutive three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96373 - 2014-09-15
years of confinement and three years of extended supervision. The court imposed a consecutive three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96373 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to twelve years and six months of initial confinement followed by seven years and six months of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242959 - 2019-06-27
to twelve years and six months of initial confinement followed by seven years and six months of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242959 - 2019-06-27
CA Blank Order
recommend one year of initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision on each count, to be served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118128 - 2014-07-22
recommend one year of initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision on each count, to be served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118128 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was sentenced to concurrent terms of fourteen years’ initial confinement, ten years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91196 - 2014-09-15
was sentenced to concurrent terms of fourteen years’ initial confinement, ten years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91196 - 2014-09-15
State v. Richard A. Devore
and individuals on extended supervision. Devore argues that this rule is inapplicable because he is neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6822 - 2005-03-31
and individuals on extended supervision. Devore argues that this rule is inapplicable because he is neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6822 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision for count one, the felony murder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303468 - 2020-11-17
of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision for count one, the felony murder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303468 - 2020-11-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
year each of initial confinement and extended supervision. 2 This no-merit appeal followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107821 - 2017-09-21
year each of initial confinement and extended supervision. 2 This no-merit appeal followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107821 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ralph Hiemstra v. Michael S. Damroth, M.D.
. § 700.16(2). ¶9 The court ruled the option in this case is invalid because it extends indefinitely upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19584 - 2017-09-21
. § 700.16(2). ¶9 The court ruled the option in this case is invalid because it extends indefinitely upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19584 - 2017-09-21