Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3141 - 3150 of 28806 for f.

Toni Nicoletti v. Teachers Retirement Board
is substantially justified if it has “a reasonable basis in law and fact.” Section 227.485(2)(f). Reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3482 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to require a “post-plea DPA.” As stated, WIS. STAT. § 961.443(2)(b)2. (2017-18) provided: “[i]f an aided
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377016 - 2021-06-16

[PDF] Platt Barber v. Ken Weber
business under WIS. STAT. §§ 62.23(7)(f)2. and 62.23(8) without having to pursue certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24599 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
-plea DPA. As stated, WIS. STAT. § 961.443(2)(b)2. (2017-18) provided: “[i]f an aided person
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=376161 - 2021-06-16

[PDF] Toni Nicoletti v. Teachers Retirement Board
justified if it has “a reasonable basis in law and fact.” Section 227.485(2)(f). Reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3482 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] George M. Reynolds v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
claims that: (1) the DNR erred in granting an exemption from WIS. ADM. CODE § NR 502.04(2)(f), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9466 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 57
the permanent right to remain in the United States. United States v. Reneslacis, 349 F.3d 412, 414 (7th Cir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110005 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 31
, to that allowable for an OWI 7th offense, a Class F felony, with higher maximum and minimum penalties. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=361452 - 2021-06-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the child. (f) Whether the child will be able to enter into a more stable and permanent family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666214 - 2023-06-08

State v. Floyd L. Marlow
. Caliendo, 910 F.2d 429, 437 (7th Cir. 1990). Cases have generally held that a defendant is prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6825 - 2005-03-31