Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3141 - 3150 of 66447 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 3141 - 3150 of 66447 for motion to dismiss.
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. L.C. Clay, Jr., pro se, appeals from an order dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28835 - 2007-06-26
PER CURIAM. L.C. Clay, Jr., pro se, appeals from an order dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28835 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
an order dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The circuit court held that the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28835 - 2014-09-15
an order dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The circuit court held that the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28835 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert J.D. Wolford
vehicle in motion.” Wolford then moved to dismiss and the court granted the motion.[1] STANDARD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15278 - 2005-03-31
vehicle in motion.” Wolford then moved to dismiss and the court granted the motion.[1] STANDARD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15278 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Corporate Development Associates, Inc. v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
-2134 2 circuit court erred in granting Johnson Controls’ motion to dismiss for failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12784 - 2017-09-21
-2134 2 circuit court erred in granting Johnson Controls’ motion to dismiss for failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12784 - 2017-09-21
Corporate Development Associates, Inc. v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
Johnson Controls’ motion to dismiss. CDA argues that the circuit court, without the benefit of any record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12784 - 2005-03-31
Johnson Controls’ motion to dismiss. CDA argues that the circuit court, without the benefit of any record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12784 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jessie L. Stokes
an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26400 - 2006-09-06
an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26400 - 2006-09-06
[PDF]
2023AP645-CR
)(a), (am) (2015– 16).2 ¶2 At sentencing, and on the State’s motion, the circuit court dismissed
/supreme/docs/23ap645mandate.pdf - 2025-07-01
)(a), (am) (2015– 16).2 ¶2 At sentencing, and on the State’s motion, the circuit court dismissed
/supreme/docs/23ap645mandate.pdf - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
WI 30
and guilty verdict: “Very well. Then on the State’s motion the [c]ourt will, in fact, dismiss [the RCS
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977954 - 2025-07-01
and guilty verdict: “Very well. Then on the State’s motion the [c]ourt will, in fact, dismiss [the RCS
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977954 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a motion to dismiss his case for lack of competency. He contends that the movants, State of Wisconsin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=464708 - 2021-12-22
a motion to dismiss his case for lack of competency. He contends that the movants, State of Wisconsin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=464708 - 2021-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Frank E. Ratcliff
for severance and his motion to dismiss the tenth and eleventh counts of the information. Both issues were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12991 - 2017-09-21
for severance and his motion to dismiss the tenth and eleventh counts of the information. Both issues were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12991 - 2017-09-21