Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31401 - 31410 of 63537 for records.
Search results 31401 - 31410 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Kevin H. Gillson
, because absolutely nothing in the record discredited Stephanie’s testimony and statements to Bannon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13341 - 2017-09-21
, because absolutely nothing in the record discredited Stephanie’s testimony and statements to Bannon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13341 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for sentence modification. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109014 - 2017-09-21
for sentence modification. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109014 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we reject the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152324 - 2017-09-21
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we reject the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152324 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, the order is summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190219 - 2017-09-21
of the record, the order is summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190219 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Vances H. Smith v. Gary R. McCaughtry
expunged from Smith’s record because Smith’s conduct in failing to stand for a cell count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10239 - 2017-09-20
expunged from Smith’s record because Smith’s conduct in failing to stand for a cell count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10239 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the record and the briefs, and after hearing oral arguments, we conclude that this matter should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586766 - 2022-11-04
the record and the briefs, and after hearing oral arguments, we conclude that this matter should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586766 - 2022-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2017- 18)1 motion for postconviction relief. Upon reviewing the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245615 - 2019-08-28
(2017- 18)1 motion for postconviction relief. Upon reviewing the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245615 - 2019-08-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the transaction and did not think he had any records of it. On the day of trial, however, in response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263130 - 2020-06-04
the transaction and did not think he had any records of it. On the day of trial, however, in response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263130 - 2020-06-04
[PDF]
State v. Tony L. Gadicke
reference, we remind appellant’s counsel that citations to the record are required for statements of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6316 - 2017-09-19
reference, we remind appellant’s counsel that citations to the record are required for statements of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6316 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James F. Emerich
the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement] was made not knowing about the Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2360 - 2017-09-19
the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement] was made not knowing about the Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2360 - 2017-09-19

